The 12 Principles: A new code is proposed for freedom of expression and the role of media in good governance across the Commonwealth
April 10, 2018 – 4:10 pm | 3 Comments

In 2013 member states of the Commonwealth acknowledged the ‘surge in popular demand for democracy and human rights’ when they adopted the Commonwealth Charter in the name of the people of the Commonwealth. The Charter …

Read the full story »
CJA News
CJA Events
Member Articles
Home » Young Journalists

CHOGM 2011: “Recommended reforms to CMAG adopted”

Submitted by on October 29, 2011 – 3:40 am2 Comments

World leaders are in Perth on the west coast of Australia this week to take part in the biennial Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM).

Steph Carter, 20, a Commonwealth Correspondent and aspiring journalist from Queensland, reports on the adoption of a raft of measures to overhaul a key body, the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group.

At the close of day one at CHOGM 2011, the Commonwealth has taken a first step to embrace change and reform.

In a joint press conference earlier today, Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma announced that the Commonwealth Council has chosen to adopt all 30 recommendations put forth by the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG).

Prior to CHOGM 2011, CMAG was directed to consider the ways in which its role may be strengthened in dealing with violations of Commonwealth human rights values. The group’s recent report, ‘Strengthening the Role of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group’, gives context to the recommendations that were put forth today to Commonwealth Heads of State.

The adoption of these 30 recommendations will lead to a revision of CMAG’s mandate and political function.

As indicated by His Excellency Sharma, the core changes to CMAG’s mandate will be the acceptance of several indicators detailing the “types of situations that might be regarded as constituting a serious and consistent violation of Commonwealth values.”

These violations include the prevention of lawful functioning of parliament and democratic institutions, postponement of mass elections and the systematic denial of political space. Ms Gillard also spoke of the planned reform recommendations, saying that today’s decision to adopt the recommendations was a “significant step forward” for the Commonwealth.

‘These recommendations now adopted also detail a set of graduated measures that CMAG can take in response to situations of concern, with a clear path and timelines for escalation.”

It is unclear as to whether a separate package of reforms proposed by the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) will be received as wholeheartedly by the Commonwealth Council. Ms Gillard indicated that a decision is yet to be reached regarding the EPG’s recommendations. “The Eminent Persons Group report is going to be the subject of discussions by leaders over the course of the weekend during the retreat,” she said.

In remarks made to earlier today, Justice Michael Kirby, a member of the EPG, expressed doubts about the Commonwealth Council adopting the recommendations.

The Commonwealth Council will resume discussions tomorrow on Commonwealth reform and other issues of global importance, including climate change and the current state of the eurozone.


Julia Gillard and Kamalesh Sharma
Julia Gillard and Kamalesh Sharma





  • Ronny says:

    Barry writes, One of this site’s many rnieemdeg features is that our readers and subscribers can say what they like – no holds barred – about the content of our reports. I wish it were so. Just in the last few days my criticisms of you, Barry and the Editor have been deleted in toto. Perhaps I lack tact. But there’s room yet for the no holds barred standard.For the Nth time, Barry, who says, I say to “Colin” ( we know who you are mate) yes, you know who I am. As I have told you, I am Colin and have been since my birth in 1950 with no association whatsoever with the ARM, ACM or anyone else to do with the republic. And I couldn’t give a stiff rats arse about the hits you crave. I come here to argue about a republic, not to cop abuse.Speaking of which, the Australian republic is of no concern to the Queen. As Barry likes to say, she will do what she is told. If her PM advises that Australia will become a republic, she has no option but to allow the proper implementation of the will of the people. Conversely, she is unable to direct the PM nor participate in influencing the Australian public one way or the other. She’s been at this for many years now and the inferences in Tess’s article would indicate she’s but a rank novice. If a republic was discussed at the private meeting with our PM, HM would have told Gillard that the issue was entirely one for the Australian people.Finally, Tess, the marriage will have to wait till we can resolve truth from fiction. That could be some time if this article is what you believe. But dry you eyes. I’m a forgiving type once you change.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.